Persons with narrow outlook are able to think barely of the objective in sight. They are not able to consider many other aspects related to the man issue. As a result they become perplexed when coming face to face with an unexpected situation and their activities come to a standstill. It provides an opportunity to conceited persons who are always on the look out to prove their dubious worth. By rejoicing on failures of others such persons add sait to the injury.

A progressive person is identified by his or her attitude towords the associates. Besides taking into consideration one’s own present and future problems in detail and arriving at some definite conclusions thereon, a progressive individual also adopts the same attitude towords the problems of associates. Such a person also keeps in readiness to meet their contingencies by taking advance actions.

Choice of incompatible associates also does become a cause of failure. On the other hand, paucity of resources is hardly a coinstraint. Work can be accomplished even with few associates. Nevertheless, credibility of these persons must be of a higher order. However, for the selection of right type of workers, one must have the wisdom of making correct choice. A person with a lowly bent of mind and narrow point of view chooses persons of his own type and since such persons can be easily enticed with promise of little returns, one feels inclined to take their help. As a consequence, whatever is achieved with the help of such persons is also substandard and the performance is much below the mark. Hence one is advised to choose appropriate type of associate for work. Where it does not appear possible, instead of taking the entire responsibility on one’s own self in over- enthusiasm, it would be better to work as associate of some system with proven organization skill. In this process, one may get lesser  remuneration, limited credit or may even be deprived of fulfilling high personal ambitions, but augmentation of experience and prudence is decisively assured.

One is therefore, advised to plan one’s own actions according to one’s own environment. It requires an independent frame of mind, farsightedness and prompt pragmatic approach.

Organisation is made after assessments of its contemporary requirements and possible needs of future and realistic planning is carried out for each stage of development with provisions for appropriate capacity. Simultaneously, one is also required to prudently seek ways and means for overcoming obstacles and make arrangement of logistics. Through it is possible to learn from experiments and experiences of past, it is not at all possible to succeed merely by imitatiing someone’s style of functioning. Environments are perpetually undergoing change and each one of us has his own characteristic way and  style of working. By aping  the methology and line of action of a successful person, one may not necessarily achieve the same degree of success. One is therefore, advised to plan one’s own actions according to one’s own environment. It requires an independent frame of mind, farsightedness and prompt pragmatic approach.

When a person begins to contemplate deeply and critically into the details of one’s existiing environment and its projections in future, it may be considered a major step in the direction of progress. Problems likely to arise in future must be anticipated well in advance and suitable steps taken to seek their solution with adequate preparation. In order to make the future brighter, it is necessary to formulate such a plan of action which can advanced in the present enviornment exclusively with the existing resources. Any decision for firm pragmatic action must be taken after projecting the existing environment into its likely future. Besides imbibing a progressive attitude, it is necessary to have a clear concept of the work in hand. Only by channelising one’s- attributes of ever –readiness and total involvement it becomes possible to increase efficiency of mind and behaviour in thoughts and practice. A sucessful completion of work benefits the doer in two ways. On one hand, his or her own level of confidence and courage increases and secondly other persons too begin to trust  his or her superiority and eagerly look forward to either give greater assistance or reciprocally, seek help. The above attributes are positive indications of a better future. Each person tknown to be talented, invariably has superb organisational skill.

Systemetic arrangement of personal articles is the first lesson in organisation of self. The articles of use should be treated as study- notes  for exacmination papers. Which are required to be kept and examined carefully. Any indifference towards them would make them appear substandard and irrelevant and would lose utility before time. On the contrary, given due importance and ordarily maintained, they proved instant useful service by commonensurate return for the care taken. Systemetecally arranged articles refllect on the mental status of a person. They create an impression that the owner is civilized, cultured and a man of taste. On the hand, haphazardly thrown articles indicate that the person is unsystemic and raw by the norms of a civilized society. It is irrelavent whether such an individual is wealthy, well educated, or otherwise.

A family consists of many members. All are required to be trained in habits of cleaness and made -up -the mark. Some of then lack of civility of behaviour and create bad impression on visitor. In the same way articles of use though dump and inanimate, it kept in a dirty and disorderly manner, indirectly divulge the secrete of the raw state of mind of the owner. Keeping  articles in a disorderly manner none creates good impresson simply by virtue of supsermacy of wealth, status or education. Dirty, haphazardly kept , broken, non-useable articles indicate substandard mental make-up and ignorance of organisational skill of the members of the house. Like living persons, neglected articles too are always looking on the look out for the earlier opportunity for an exit (i.e. they become disposable). It hardly matters whether they become property of someone, or are sold in a junk market. 

With courage and farsightedness one can upgrade not only physical and mental efficiency, but also improve virtues, actions and behaviour (Gun, karm and swabhav). It is very much possible to change or reform one’s confirmed habits.

It may be difficult to persuade, advise, support or reform of someone else, but n one’s own reformation and improvement, there can hardly  be any other obstacles than lack of will or power of determination.

With courage and farsightedness one can upgrade not only physical and mental efficiency, but also improve virtues, actions and behaviour (Gun, karm and swabhav). It is very much possible to change or reform one’s confirmed habits. The environment in which one prefers to live is chosen by one’s self. If desired, one can totally change personal environment. Just like the voluntarily chosen substandard environment of the past which became responsible for the present misery, one can also select a superior motivating milieu for progress in future. Close transactions with ethically elevated persons together with a refined environment open umpteen possibilities for progress and upgradation in life.done only checker.

The habit of passing on responssibility of small jobs to othere for own convience thus creates big obstacles in development of personal talent and refinement of organisational skill.

A constant care shoulld be taken to remove dirt and gabarage and for repair of broken and unfuctional articles. Generally the owner leaves such jobs for servants or others on excuse of shortage of time overlooking the advantages by incoporation of orderliness in nature and expertise in practice. In this context it is not relevant whether the responsibility transferred to others is big or trival. When intimately personal work is entrusted to someone else, one can not by fully assured that it would be appropriately performed at the right time. Besides, shirking responsibility sets a bad examlple of indolence for other associates. The habit of passing on responssibility of small jobs to othere for own convience thus creates big obstacles in development of personal talent and refinement of organisational skill.